Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-18-2016
Abstract
This paper explores the ageing attitudes and long-term care planning behavior of adult Hispanics in New London, Connecticut, a town with 30 thousand inhabitants that is rapidly ageing. We conducted six focus groups and had 37 participants share their ageing perceptions and long-term care needs. Our main findings suggest that informal care arrangements are vulnerable and unsustainable especially since women have historically and disproportionately provided most family eldercare even at their own personal and financial expense. Though male participants expected their female relatives to care for them when they age and need personal assistance, female participants did not necessarily expect the same from their relatives including their daughters. Also, both formal and government long-term care systems lack cultural competence and can be prohibitively costly. Therefore, Hispanics plan for ageing within their circles of family care and their resilience in a context of cultural exclusion and socio-economic disadvantage epitomizes strong intergenerational values. These support networks may help explain why may outlive whites (the "Hispanic paradox") who, on average, have higher wealth and education levels. Long-term care planning is a complex process that cannot be relayed to families only. Adequate training for family members from other relatives, and from private and government entities to appropriately convey this type of planning is vital to ensure that Hispanic families understand their options.
Recommended Citation
Cruz-Saco, María Amparo and López-Anuarbe, Mónika, "Ageing and Long-Term Care Planning Perceptions of Hispanics in the USA: Evidence from a Case Study in New London, Connecticut" (2016). Economics Faculty Publications. 39.
https://digitalcommons.conncoll.edu/econfacpub/39
The views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author.
Comments
This is an authors' postprint. Original version published online: 18 June 2016, Ageing Int (2017) 42:488–503
DOI 10.1007/s12126-016-9249-3
© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016